CAN QUANTUM STATE INFLUENCE PARTICLE DETECTION? (PROPOSITION)
Because I
did not graduate in physics or mathematics, most of quantum field technology or
quantum mechanics is beyond my comprehension. The ‘double slit experiment’ seems to
show that also insiders fail to understand why the particle pops up at another
location than expected or predicted. The outcome of the experiment forces us to
accept it as an axiom. In essence: the fact that, once we start measuring the
location of a particle in a wave, the wave starts behaving as a dispersion of
particles and the particular particle showed up at a location, solely based on
probability. That could indicate that the particle ‘knows’ or ‘anticipates’
that a measurement takes place, before as well as after it has passed the
double slit. I do not accept the idea that a particle can ‘know’ or
‘anticipate’ and therefore something different is happening.
Assuming it
is correct that flow and radiation of matter really behave like a wave and
particles simultaneously, then perhaps such a flow does not necessarily have to
be continuous, but an interrupted or intermittent flow, meaning its particles
and quanta are separated more strongly perhaps than quantum physics has been
assuming so far.
In the trajectory
between a source and a receptor/detector such a quantum can go on and off, or
blink regularly. Maybe there’s a difference in charge between the ‘on’ and
‘off’ state, maybe there exist quanta and antiquanta, perhaps quanta or
particles with opposite spin, vector and momentum, and maybe the difference
between quantum and antiquantum is binary, with the quantum on = 1 and the
antiquantum on = 0.
When
calculation that a particle is supposed to be at location A, then it is indeed
there in case the quantum state = 1 (on), but it fails to be detected whan the
quantum state = 0 (off). The observer then assumes to be observing exactly that
particle, but in another – unexpected – location, whereas it is just another
particle, whose quantum state happens to be = 1.
Perhaps, as
these assumprions prove to be valid, conditions may depend on continuity in
quantum field operators, which may oscillate between 0 and 1 (or other values).
If 0 and 1 are not binary statuses, then there may be threshold values in the
range in which the oscillation varies, which encourage or block the visibility
of the particle.
This is no
more than a proposition of assumptions. Can you imagine quanta of electromagnetic waveparticles (or particlewaves, for that matter) to blink between 'on' and 'off'? Do you have a full explanation of the double slit experiment?
<<
Comments
Post a Comment